Uncivil Service
“Our inland revenue department has more staff than the Royal Navy, it seems our government thinks that the best form of defence is a tax” - Yes Minister, The Economy Drive.
You’ve got to love the civil service. Well not really. Most of my exposure to civil servants involves peering at them through the wide array of files and tea cups on their desks, being interrupted when they answer the phone and then continue their conversation oblivious to my presence in the room, even if it’s about the neighbour’s cat. By the time the phone call is over it’s 4.30 and mid-sentence he (or she, sorry Amartya) stands up, smiles and makes haste to the bus stand. Some of the above are generalisations, but they are generally true. I’m still unsure what the difference between a civil servant and a government employee is. If there is no difference, then in SL there are more servants than masters. There are still a few good men and women in Sri Lanka’s administrative service, the remnants of the exam intake days. It’ll be another decade or so before we really feel the pinch of political appointees and graduate employment schemes. Anyway, this isn’t meant to be a rant though it is fast becoming one.
I was in Delhi last week and met some fascinating civil servants, mainly from India and Pakistan and their respective foreign services. Diplomats are like actors, you never really know what they’re up to. They’re trained to appear interested in the most boring of environments and to coat everything in five layers of sugar. But this makes them all the more intersting. A diplomat from Pakistan provided an absolute masterclass in backroom diplomacy over dinner. At the table were 5 of us from the SAARC countries other than India and Nepal. I asked the Pakistani diplomat whether it’s more pleasant working in India given the thawing of relations between the two countries. He first laughed and said that when things are “good” between two countries it’s not “good” for diplomats bc there’s more work for them, it’s better when they’re not on talking terms. (I had my doubts about this statement, I mean I’d much rather be Sri Lanka’s first secretary in the Bahamas than in Norway, but I guess he has a point). This guy was really interesting, I loved his use of language, analogies, and his background. I asked him where he’s from and he said ____ province. I use a blank bc I had never heard of the place, and now I can’t remember it. It was surprising bc you’d expect a senior diplomat to be from one of the major cities, Karachi, Islamabad or Lahore. Apparently this guy is from a tribal region, in his words “the part of Pakistan that isn’t ruled by Musharaff’s laws”. I asked him who’s laws does it fall under, to which he looked me in the eyes and said, “Our laws.” I giggled. He put down his fork and knife and said that he’s serious. “My father is the chief of our tribe, and I am next in line to be chief,” and then continued to eat. I couldn’t believe it. This man, in a suit, speaking in the most cultured English and quoting Humphrey Appleby, a tribesman? I asked him what he’s doing here, being chief sounds like it could be quite fun. But apparently he didn’t like bodyguards so he let his younger brother take that route. Fair enough. I tried to be clever and said that he doesn’t look like a Pathan, he didn’t look up from his Murgh Tikka and replied that not all tribesmen are Pathans and not all Pathans are tribesmen. D’oh.
In between our exchange, he managed to convince all around the table (now joined by an Indian academic) that the only reason Indo-Pak relations are not moving as fast as they should is the Indians. And not the politicians, but the bureaucracy, and in chief the military bureaucracy. He then explained how the power of the civil service is still massive in India and Pakistan, and how one letter to the Minister from the Secretary (or general) saying “Sir, if you go ahead with this, I can not be held responsible for the consequences,” would stop the minister dead in his tracks. The rest of us looked at one another unconvinced, the Pakistani diplomat then said “Have you watched Yes Minister? I rest my case.” He went on to say that Pakistan is run by a military man, not a politician, and he’s pushing for resolution but India is stalling. I asked why he thinks India is stalling, “Their army is 5% of your population. What will they do if there’s peace?” By now most of his conversation was aimed at the Indian academic, who in turn asked him why Pakistan is not giving MFN status to India in terms of economic relations. The diplomat cleverly side-stepped using some analogies which diverted from the issue at hand before killing the Indian’s argument with the hard facts about informal trade routed via Dubai and Singapore. (None of this can deny the fact that Pakistan doesn’t extend the most basic economic diplomacy to India).
He carried on with momentum, “So we don’t want you to solve Kashmir just yet, just start with the simple things like Siachen (glacier) and Sir Creek, then we’d have something to tell the ppl in Pakistan that it’s a two way process, and MFN can be considered” The resolution of both issues seems to require some form of concession by India, particularly at the glacier where India in all probability has more to lose from a joint troop withdrawal. Interestingly, Siachen glacier is the highest battleground in the world, and 80% of casualties are due to the climate rather than bullets. The Indian struggled to meet the Pakistani’s tact, and quietly left the table. The victor pounced on the opportunity to lobby the other SAARC diplomats to put pressure on India (and Pakistan, he said, almost as an afterthought) to solve issues that are holding back the region as a whole. There were nods all around. It was a classic case of bullying, the powerful diplomat armed with tact and words wielded like stealthy arrows, against a harmless academic throwing around a few textbook arguments in a political vacuum. He had no chance. All the other kids in playground were in such awe that they saw the bully as a hero. Uncivil bullying by a civil servant, brilliant. I came home from Delhi with a dodgy stomach and a fresh curiosity about the civil service. The former was cured by some tarivid and thambbum hodi, the latter by my newly acquired Yes Minister DVDs. It is as they say in Paris, Le shit.
P.s.
In other news, I thought I had discovered the world’s greatest irony and I was thrilled about it, but response thus far has been muted, and possibly slightly confused. Anyway the irony is this; everyone in the world is unique.

